Template Credit: Adapted from a template made available by Dr. Jason Brownlee of Machine Learning Mastery.

SUMMARY: The purpose of this project is to construct a predictive model using various machine learning algorithms and to document the end-to-end steps using a template. The Metro Interstate Traffic Volume dataset is a regression situation where we are trying to predict the value of a continuous variable.

INTRODUCTION: This dataset captured the hourly measurement of Interstate 94 Westbound traffic volume for MN DoT ATR station 301. The station is roughly midway between Minneapolis and St Paul, MN. The dataset also included the hourly weather and holiday attributes for assessing their impacts on traffic volume.

In iteration Take1, we established the baseline mean squared error without much of feature engineering. This round of modeling also did not include the date-time and weather description attributes.

In this iteration, we will include the time stamp feature and observe its effect on prediction accuracy.

ANALYSIS: From iteration Take1, the baseline performance of the machine learning algorithms achieved an average RMSE of 2646. Two algorithms (K-Nearest Neighbors and Gradient Boosting) achieved the top RMSE metrics after the first round of modeling. After a series of tuning trials, Gradient Boosting turned in the top overall result and achieved an RMSE metric of 1887. By using the optimized parameters, the Gradient Boosting algorithm processed the test dataset with an RMSE of 1878, which was even better than the prediction from the training data.

In the current iteration, the performance of the machine learning algorithms achieved an average RMSE of 1559. Two algorithms (Random Forest and Extra Trees) achieved the top RMSE metrics after the first round of modeling. After a series of tuning trials, Random Forest turned in the top overall result and achieved an RMSE metric of 465. By using the optimized parameters, the Random Forest algorithm processed the test dataset with an RMSE of 461, which was slightly better than the prediction from the training data.

By including the date_time information and related attributes, the machine learning models did a significantly better job in prediction with a much lower RMSE.

CONCLUSION: For this iteration, the Random Forest algorithm achieved the best overall results using the training and testing datasets. For this dataset, Random Forest should be considered for further modeling.

Dataset Used: Metro Interstate Traffic Volume Data Set

Dataset ML Model: Regression with numerical and categorical attributes

Dataset Reference: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Metro+Interstate+Traffic+Volume

One potential source of performance benchmarks: https://www.kaggle.com/ramyahr/metro-interstate-traffic-volume

The HTML formatted report can be found here on GitHub.